Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Blog Article
We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy from the information contained on this site, or perhaps the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can generate inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
How much sway case legislation holds might change by jurisdiction, and by the exact circumstances of your current case. To discover this concept, take into account the following case law definition.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is often a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents in the boy or Woman don't approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they will do if they might Lower off social relations with the son or even the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these types of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl that's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person that's a major, the few is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who provides these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings with the police against this kind of persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by law.
Typically, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (which includes These in clear violation of recognized case legislation) towards the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, and the case just isn't appealed, the decision will stand.
Consequently, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner should go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these types of an appeal has not but been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may well then request further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
Just some years back, searching for case precedent was a tough and time consuming job, demanding people today to search through print copies of case regulation, or to purchase access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a host of case law search opportunities, and many sources offer free access to case law.
PLR can be a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
However it really is made apparent that police is free to consider action against check here any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject matter to law. However no harassment shall be caused to your petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of regulation. Police shall also ensure respect with the family drop in accordance with regulation and if they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they could act, as far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security with the house is concerned, which is just not public place under the Act 1977. nine. Thinking about the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has become achieved. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of within the terms stated over. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 40 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming towards the main case, It's also a nicely-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings to the evidence.
Summaries give an essential glimpse into the intricate landscape of Environment and Climate Laws in Pakistan. Delving into this realm unveils a mosaic of regulations and policies targeted at safeguarding natural resources, mitigating environmental degradation, and combating climate change.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety times. If your appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then method the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the ninety times for the department to act has already expired. On the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided via the decision of your Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.
The reason for this difference is that these civil regulation jurisdictions adhere into a tradition that the reader should be able to deduce the logic from the decision plus the statutes.[four]
Because of their position between The 2 main systems of legislation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as combined systems of regulation.
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage isn't thorough, but this is a superb starting point. See Background section at base of RECAP website for more information.